Small Things: The Good, The Bad, and the Possibilities
by Teresa Leslie
A Small Thing I Like:
I have been really enjoying the Sonny/Carly scenes of late, and have forgiven
Guza the "big event" that brought them together. I admit it--I was skeptical about
this relationship, given what I felt was the contrived nature of their initial
coming together. I hated just about everything surrounding Jason's exit from the
show, and I hated the "Sonny and Carly fall into bed" twist in particular. Now,
I love the way things have played out. A pregnant Carly has a reason to develop
a relationship with Sonny, and Sonny has a reason to make an effort to get to
know and appreciate a pregnant Carly.
The small thing to which I refer is not, however, the tiny Car-son-ette. It
is instead the hysterical way Sonny and Carly frequently imitate one another in
small ways. At Sonny's casino, Carly did a dead-on impersonation of her host,
complete with hand gestures. Sonny has returned the favor from time to time. While
Sonny most often imitates Carly's speech, using expressions she uses, Carly usually
imitates Sonny's mannerisms. Sarah Brown's Carly can, and does, do the patented
Sonny shoulder shrug, the crossed-arms pose, and the head cock.
Some GH fans (including at least one GHR editor) have complained that
this mimicking of one another is distracting, and consider it a matter of Sarah
Brown imitating Maurice Benard and vice versa. I disagree. To me, it is clear
that the characters, not just the actors, are the ones doing the mirroring. It
is a part of their growing camaraderie, in many cases a way of flirting. I myself
have often teased friends and family members in similar fashion, gently mocking
a catch phrase someone uses all the time or a distinctive gesture.
Sonny is used to intimidating people, even the women in his life. Carly reacts
to him differently than anyone else ever has. She goes toe-to-toe with him, and
bursts his brooding bubble with her willingness to poke fun at his larger-than-life
persona. When Sonny parrots Carly's expressions, I see it as a way of showing
her that he is paying attention to her, even when he sounds dismissive. Attention
is something the affection-starved Carly craves. Sonny lets her know that the
things she says are registering with him. She often said that only Jason knew
the real her, that only around Jason could she be her authentic self. Now she
is learning that Sonny notices the things that make her unique as well, and that
he appreciates her more than either of them ever anticipated was possible.
There is a certain teenage silliness to the playful way they imitate one another,
to be sure. That's part of its charm for me. Carly and Sonny have both been such
drama-soaked characters. They have suffered much, and brought most of the travails
on themselves, either directly or indirectly. Both have seen loved ones suffer
and even die as a result of their actions. Both have tremendous emotional scars
and a high level of self-loathing. Both are pariahs of sorts, accustomed to verbal
attacks from otherwise decorous Port Charles citizens whenever they go out in
public (and sometimes even when they are at home in the penthouse minding their
own business!). On his birthday, Sonny had only to walk across the dining room
at the Port Charles Grille to become the target of venomous remarks from both
Edward and Alan. Even Audrey Hardy does nothing to try to mask her disdain for
the criminal Mr. Corinthos. Carly has been the recipient of even more insulting
remarks and petty slights; the wedding shower where all the guests save one brought
presents for Michael rather than her (and the sole exception, Emily, insulted
her openly with rude remarks while gifting her with a negligee) stands out in
my mind. I would not argue that these characters have done nothing to inspire
the harsh feelings some feel toward them. Still, from their perspective, it must
be draining to be reminded constantly that public opinion is not favorable toward
them and that most folks assume the worst of them.
In this atmosphere, it is refreshing to see the pair carve out a private space
where they can share a playful side to their natures, where they can revel in
having a kindred soul with whom to connect. What would be an insult from anyone
else--throwing someone's words or gestures back in his or her face--has become
a form of endearment between these two. When Sonny teasingly imitates Carly's
whine, it has the slightest of edges to it, but it also shows her that he is listening
to her specifically, not simply responding to her as a generic "woman" in his
life, lumped in with all the other women he has known. When Carly mocks his imperious
tone, she is letting him know that he does not need to put up such a macho front
because she can see through it anyway.
Maurice Bernard and Sarah Brown do seem to be enjoying their scenes immensely.
However, I remain convinced that the impersonations that Carly and Sonny have
been swapping lately are signs that the characters, not just the actors, enjoy
one another's company.
A Small Thing I Don't Like:
I am not philosophically opposed to recasts. I accept some with equanimity--Tom
Hardy springs to mind. Others I adamantly opposed--I never warmed to the new Justus,
and did not miss him when he disappeared from our screens. The news that GH
was recasting Lucky did not bother me, since it seemed a logical move, given the
corner GH painted themselves into by showing us that Lucky did indeed survive
the fire. I did not have strong feelings one way or the other about NuLucky; I
only prayed whoever filled the role would be able to act.
I have been pleasantly surprised at how well NuLucky has worked out so far.
The actor seems to be doing a fine job. We have been given time to adjust to a
new actor in the role as Lucky was slowly reintroduced. First we just caught glimpses
of Helena's captive, but did not hear him speak. Then we had scenes in which he
interacted with Helena. His scenes gradually grew longer, and we heard more and
more from this young man. Now he's back in Port Charles and we have seen him talk
to his little sister and to Mike. (I am writing this on the weekend after he and
Elizabeth came face to face on the dock, so I don't know if he will wind up talking
to her or if he will run off, as he did with Luke and Laura.)
This was a good way to help viewers adjust to the new Lucky. A lot of the
differences between Lucky before captivity and Lucky after can be ascribed to
changes the character underwent while being held, rather than simply to the fact
that a different actor is portraying him. This Lucky is quieter, more thoughtful
and circumspect. Old Lucky was a lot like his father--fast-talking, quick to act,
a little hotheaded, instinctual. Truth be told, this Lucky acts more like Stefan--watchful
and contemplative, always thinking three moves ahead before he acts. I use a chess
metaphor deliberately. When Faison first started using chess as a way for Lucky
to earn information, I found it an odd choice. Lucky did not strike me as a chess
player; he didn't have the patience. Now, however, he is an accomplished chess
player, and he seems to have a chess player's temperament, as does Stefan. He
has acquired patience over the past year.
So, if I'm satisfied with the recast, what small thing am I going to complain
about? The reshooting of old Lucky/Elizabeth scenes to replay in flashbacks, that's
what. First we had the scene of Lucky bringing Elizabeth gifts from Canada, then
we had the memorable scene where Elizabeth asked Lucky to kiss her. I fail to
see the reason for having Jacob Young re-shoot these scenes that Jonathan Jackson
did originally. It complete undercuts the whole point of having the character
off-stage so long before he was reintroduced. Also, as my editor-in-chief has
reminded me, several characters have spoken about how Lucky will have changed
and grown during his absence. One scene in particular stands out: after the audience
had seen Lucky but before Laura had learned he was still alive, we saw her growing
tearful during a conversation with Elizabeth at the hospital as she noted how
quickly the young girl was growing up and wondered aloud how different Lucky would
look by now if he had not died. Why undercut the value of having characters comment
that Lucky would undoubtedly look different now by then giving us flashbacks with
NuLucky in them that show, gee, what do you know, he looks basically the same?
More importantly, this muddles the establishment of NuLucky as a changed young
man, by showing us NuLucky in OriginalLucky scenes. Let me explain. The kissing
scene was, when originally shown, an outstanding scene precisely because of the
qualities Jonathan Jackson brought to the role. There was an air of young innocence
to Jonathan Jackson's Lucky, and he played that scene in a way that neatly balanced
Lucky's desire to kiss Elizabeth and his awkwardness given the situation. Lucky
was achingly young and sincere at that point in his life. There was a certain
playful sarcasm to his words, to be sure, but it was mixed with a wealth of other
notes.
Young's Lucky seems older and less, for want of a better word, virginal, and
these qualities carried over, despite the actor's best efforts, into the flashbacks.
In the flashback of the "kiss me" scene, Lucky seemed more sure of himself, more
teasing and less flustered than the original scene played. It was very subtle,
to be sure, but there were differences between this Lucky and the original, and
it showed. Suddenly, we were reminded that Lucky was not merely a year older and
deeply changed by the ordeal to which he had been subjected, but that he was being
played by a different actor. The suspension of our disbelief was disturbed, in
my opinion. I was reminded that this was an actor playing a role, by being confronted
with him doing a scene I still clearly remember another actor doing previously.
I really did not see any reason to give us these flashbacks. Luke and Laura
spoke, during their pursuit of Lucky, of scenes from their earlier adventures
in such a way as to evoke them vividly for those of us who saw them first time
around without needing an actual visual image from the past, thus neatly keeping
us rooted in the present while recalling the past. When Luke spoke fondly of young
Laura in her sarong, it brought it all back for me; if we had actually seen a
flash of a teenage Genie Francis with a flower in her hair, the emphasis would
have shifted from the fact that Luke remembered that summer with a smile. We could
just as easily have had Elizabeth reminisce about the time she asked Lucky to
kiss her without seeing the scene for ourselves. Earlier in the same episode,
in fact, she described for Nikolas the first time she laid eyes on Lucky, outside
Kelly's diner when she stepped outside to smoke. There was no flashback, and the
reminiscing was far more effective for its absence.
Perhaps GH writers felt a flashback was necessary because Elizabeth
was sitting alone on the bench, and there was therefore no one to whom she could
relate her memories. Even so, it could have been done without giving us a complete
recreation of the scene with the new actor. Couldn't they have at least have taken
a minimalist approach? We could have seen a glimpse of NuLucky partially obscured,
shot from the side or back, and then focused on Elizabeth herself in flashback,
hearing a brief line or two from her side of the scene, perhaps her initial statement
about wanting to feel normal again by doing something she was afraid of, like
kissing a boy.
By the way, these awkward flashbacks make me appreciate even more the far-more-effective
use of flashbacks we have had in the Bobbie/Roy story. True, A Martinez bears
an uncanny similarity to the original actor, so it was possible to use the original
footage of the shooting. Early in the reintroduction, however, we also got glimpses
of a young Bobbie expressing her delight at the engagement ring a young Roy had
given her, and in that scene, we see the back of Roy's head but do not hear any
dialogue from him. That's the way to use a flashback when the actor has changed,
in my opinion.
A Small Thing I'd Like to See:
It struck me one day, as Carly was calling for yet another cab to pick her
up at the Quartermaine mansion (okay, this was some time ago), that I would love
to see her actually riding in a cab. Remember the scene when the driver of the
limousine in which a kidnapped Bobbie sat waiting to be freed turned around and,
to Bobbie's surprised relief, it was Roy? I would love to someday see a cab driver
turn around to speak to Carly and see, to my delight, that he is none other than
our old pal Slick. Long-time viewers must remember Slick, the sartorially-challenged
cabbie who was once a close friend of Uncle Luke. I would love for Carly to meet
Slick, and for Slick to meet her.
GH has a long tradition of colorful, humorous minor characters, and
I have missed them in recent years. Yes, we have Reginald, and I am pleased that
he has a love life with Leticia, although I do wish she were fleshed out into
a more entertaining character in her own right, comparable to our beloved butler.
Claude the bartender has the potential to be such a character, if we saw just
a bit more of him. While he is the butt of comedy--Luke's running gag about firing
Claude--he does not supply much comic relief himself, though I suspect that could
change. Otherwise, there is a real scarcity of such slightly eccentric characters.
There are plenty of back-burner characters (just ask our own Judy)--Lesley,
Amy, Audrey, Dara, Mike, Tammy, etc., etc. They do not fit my vision of "colorful,"
however, nor, with the exception of Amy, are they primarily used to supply humor.
Andreas and Mrs. Lansbury are distinctive minor characters, as opposed to backburnered
regulars, but they are not particularly funny characters, either. What is lacking
lately are deliciously eccentric minor characters who add color to the GH
canvas and set it apart from other soaps. I would love to see Madame Delphina
try to convince Chloe Morgan to make designs for Delphina's Dress Shop, for example,
or Officer Rick administer a Breathalizer test to AJ.
V and Simon fit the mold perfectly, but they are off exploring the wide world.
I miss them. Wouldn't it have been wonderful if Luke and his ladies had bumped
into them somewhere during the recent globe-spanning quest for Lucky? Or if Jax
and Chloe had discovered them traipsing around St. Petersburg? Who knows where
that cruise around the world might take the pair? I can see it now: Laura, having
left Stefan in the capacious closet on the "Haunted Star," told him she would
call the authorities to let him out once she and Luke were safely away. It would
have been a fun twist to have her signal a passing cruise ship instead, one that
just happened to include Simon and V among the passengers. How I would have loved
to hear V yelp, "Mr. Cassadine?" as Stefan was brought aboard.
Back to Front Page of Issue
Back to Top
|